I especially liked the readings for this week involving Book Clubs. I can directly relate to the ideas presented in these articles (Salna and Raphael) because for my Literacy Lesson in my 4th grade class I am working with a Book Club group and I meet with them two times a week. The Salna article says that Book Clubs “create the opportunity for discussion about serious issues such as prejudice, injustice, and racism”. I think this is very true and it is seen in my Book Club. We are reading The Watson’s Go to Birmingham, which addresses many important social issues. One that we have recently talked about is bullying. In my placement school there is a great deal of bullying and it was cool to see the students relate the events in the story to their own lives and put themselves in the shoes of a character. We just completed our first journal entry writing and although these were not lengthy responses it was very interesting to read what they had to say. Salna mentioned that writing is easier for some students compared to discussions, which I found to be true also. Writing ensures that each and every student gets to get their thoughts out and then when we discuss they have something to add because they had the time to think about it and write it beforehand.
I really liked the fishbowl idea mentioned in the Salna article also and I think that is a great way for students to listen to each other and offer both positive and negative comments regardless of the book each group is reading. However, in my particular classroom I think this technique would get out of hand very quickly. My students have a very hard time listening and responding to their classmates in a positive way. I think this is why my teacher tends to shy away from discussions. Although that is not a reason to completely disregard in depth discussions it will take a lot of practice and ground rules need to be set before this type of discussion should occur. Raphael explains that “students are taught norms for appropriate behavior such as listening with respect, building n others’ ideas, debating and critiquing ideas, assuming leadership, and following another’s lead”. This is much easier said then done. This takes a great deal of practice. Salna stated that discussions take a lot of practice and over time students will get better at responding to each other and getting their ideas out, which I completely agree with.
The Raphael article also talks about “sustaining the interest of and promoting the learning of students across all ability levels”. This can be very difficult also. Although my students are in the more advanced reading group, there are still some who struggle greatly when they read aloud and others who are completely fluent and have no trouble at all. When we first started reading aloud the students started to make fun of each other whenever they stumbled on a word or phrase. However, they have improved greatly and I made sure to address this right away. I told the students that we all make mistakes when we read aloud; including me (I read the majority of the text), therefore if someone makes a mistake it is disrespectful to laugh because you wouldn’t want them to laugh at you. Also, I told them that they are not to correct their classmates and if I find the need for the correct pronunciation of a word or helping someone with a word they do not know, I will do it not them. I’m looking forward to continuing meeting with my group and continuing to discuss and respond to major themes from The Watson’s Go to Birmingham.
Good post! I remember reading in the Salna article that she wrote she teaches in either an all-white school or a school that has no African American students in the population. I'm not sure why that idea strikes me as archaic, and I'm sure the school wasn't socially sanctioned to be that way, but growing up in the suburbs of Detroit in which we have the largest community of people of Middle Eastern descent outside of the Middle East, the largest population of people of African descent outside of Africa and the largest population of white folk per square mile made it so that diversity, even in the suburbs, was a part of every day living. I liked how in the Salna article she says: "I wanted to introduce my students to some authentic issues that were appropriate to their age level as well as controversial topics for them to think about, write about and discuss. I also wanted to introduce a range of genres..." (pg. 44) Three things are important that she brings up in just this tiny space. 1) she wants her books to be age-appropriate - crucial for her students to be able to even engage in any form of debate or discussion controversial or otherwise. 2) she wants some of her book choices to be controversial. An enormous fan of controversy myself, I dig anybody who wants to challenge to status quo. And 3) she wants to expose her students to a variety of genres. This exposure to genres is crucial as it gets students to think about how works can be used cross-textually, but have different meanings depending on the genre in which it appears. It also diversifies the students' understanding of different genres which can only make for more well-rounded individuals.
ReplyDeleteSarah,
ReplyDeleteYou're last paragraph really struck a chord with me. I can't even explain about how TO THIS DAY I feel reading out loud because I stumble on words and it's so embarrassing. I don't remember kids directly laughing at me when I was a kid but I just remember being embarrassed for myself and wondering what the kids were thinking. I think that it's great that you took control of the group and explained that you, yourself, make mistakes too and that no one deserves to be laughed at. I also liked that you said that you would be the one to help the student because I know that I hated with students would correct me. It made me feel so stupid. However, do you think maybe there's a benefit to students correcting other students? Is there a time and a place for that or should that never be an option? I know that kids can feel a lot of rejection when their peers "help them out." I'm just wondering if there's a time and a place where that would be acceptable or beneficial.
Thanks for your thoughts,
Melody